So What Really Struck The Pentagon?
My Fellow Americans:
This is an addendum to my most recent commentary, " Confessions Of A CIA Agent - "The Gov't Did 9/11".
The basic question here is: So,... What Really Struck The Pentagon?
The short answer is: An ALCM AGM 86-D with an AUP-EDE Warhead*.
*Note: Air Launched Cruise Missile - Air Guided Missile with an Advance Unitary Penetrating - Energy Dense Explosive Warhead.
The slightly longer answer:
My military background is in Missile Systems and Aircraft,... specifically, surface-to-air anti-aircraft missiles called Stingers.
In the training that comes along with the specifics of deploying and utilizing Stinger Missiles, you also study other SAM (Surface to Air Missile) systems, and study aircraft ad-nauseum to learn their visual recognition so you don't accidentally shoot down one of your own.
One of the little disclosed features of Shoulder Fired Sams is, once it leaves the tube,... there is no way to stop it. There is no abort or self-destruct feature that you can signal should you let one loose, only to realize moments later,.... you just screwed up.
Typically, MANPADS (as shoulder fired systems are sometimes called), do have a "self-destruct" feature, but that is only after the missile has used up its cruise range and is out of propellant and about to crash to the ground. To avoid the enemy finding one intact, they typically have a self-destruct command that get initiated somewhere around 20-30 seconds after launch.
Ok,.. just a thumb nail version of my background as it relates to the subject of missile systems.
Next-Up,.. so what really hit the Pentagon on 9/11?
Well,... the big problem with identifying the actual object, is the shear obfuscation and evidence blocking by the criminal cartel mistakenly called a gov't.
Whenever you do a forensics investigation of any event, one of the primary tools of the investigator is evidence gathering.
This evidence is usually in the form of debris, video, photo, eye witness accounts and any thing else that will help reconstruct the event of interest to determine the sequence of events that led to the catastrophic result prompting the investigation.
In the case of 9/11 and the Pentagon hit, most of the evidence was immediately concealed, hidden, classified, removed, refuted, distorted, misrepresented and any other activity of cover-up you can imagine, and some you can't.
This creates the difficulty of reconstructing the event in question with varying degrees of difficulty and yields a result which can not be considered 100% reliable. Fortunately, despite their best efforts, we can none the less still do a fairly good job with just a lingering doubt or two to consider,... which in this case is the exact air assault vehicle used to attack the Pentagon.
From the flight profile, to the nature of the impact and resultant damage, coupled with several operational requirements such as launch, launch detection and so forth, the best estimate of what struck the Pentagon on 9/11 is that it was an ALCM AGM 86-D, or least one of its close variants.
I will not attempt to list all the considerations that go into this disclosure, as this is not the forensics report in and of itself, but rather a general disclosure being made for your consideration.
A little about the ALCM AGM 86-D
Loading an AGM-86 ALCM on a B-52 at Minot Air Force Base
Air Launched Cruise Missle - Air Guided Missile 86, Version D is what that nice complicated military abbreviation stands for.
Technically speaking, the version that hit the Pentagon would be considered the CALCM version, which is the Conventional Air Launched Cruise Missile, meaning it's warhead was conventional, or non-nuclear. The AGM 86 was initially designed to carry nuclear warhead payloads (ALCM's) and was later modified with different models to include conventional warhead payloads (CALCM's)
It is a US Air Force inventory item, built by Boeing starting back in the 70's and fully operational by the early 80's.
It has a turbo-fan jet engine for propulsion, can carry a 1,200 pound warhead better than a 1,000 miles (exact range classified), and fully autonomous once launched.
They are about 21 feet long, 12 feet wide, weigh about 1 1/2 tons, are about 2 1/2 feet in diameter, cost about $1 million each, and cruise about 550 mph (which co-incidentally is almost the exact speed of what struck the Pentagon on 9/11).
I had written articles on this before, and had covered it several times when a co-host on a radio show, but since we just had this disclosure by a CIA agent that the US Gov't committed 9/11, at least as far as his involvement went on Bldg 7, I thought it would be interesting to expand on that notion a little and mention what is most likely to have actually been used to hit the Pentagons Budget Analysis office on 9/11, where most of the people that got killed, where one of the ones trying to find the missing $2.3 Trillion that Rumsfeld announced on 9/10/2001.
Notice I say, "most likely" as to what hit the Pentagon.
This is because one of the first things this EFIO always does when it carrys out another Black-Flag Event, is move in and grab the evidence, especially that which shows their hand in the matter, hence why the FBI showed up almost immediately after the Pentagon was hit, and confiscated any and all video tapes from adjacent locations and even threatened witnesses to not talk about what they actually saw.
Under these conditions, where the forensics evidence is suppressed, altered, destroyed, confiscated and the like, this leaves little to reconstruct the event with, however, there is still enough available despite their best efforts to hide the truth, that allows us to determine what occurred even if we cannot say with 100% certainty what specific model of CALCM was used,.. we can say what variant class it is, and use some of the gov't own disclosed "official report" information to support that,.. such as the impact velocity of the object that struck the Pentagon being roughly 530 mph according to the 9/11 Commission Report,.. which is physically impossible for any commercial aircraft to do at sea level, but is exactly what an AGM 86-D would have done.
Perhaps I will write a more detailed report on this aspect of 9/11,.. but my intent with this article, was just to add an addendum to my previous commentary discussing the CIA agent's (Malcolm Howard) supposed death confession about his, and the CIA's involvement in wiring up Bldg 7 for a controlled demolition collapse on 9/11.
This is just to arm people with the knowledge of what hit the Pentagon on 9/11, and that it certainly was NOT a commercial aircraft.
When trying to understand what really happened on 9/11,... I find it is very helpful if people have the facts in their hands.